Monday, November 28, 2005

PADILLA NOT INDICTED ON DIRTY BOMB CHARGES

Posted by: Justabridge | Nov 28, 2005 8:17:29 PM Washington Post Comment
I find it pretty impressive that seemingly intelligent people can get caught up in the minutia of the propaganda itself, without actually getting oriented to the reality.
Be ready to 'gasp': Bush is not the first President to create, cover up, endorse, support, or fund "fantasy enemies", or co-conspirators aligned against the American people. Bush, however, is arrogantly defying the reasoning of the sane in this country, by promoting this type of criminal action as the norm. He has won the support of the minority who has a passion to believe that the Americans have enemies INDEPENDENT of the US foreign policies.
Talking about the reality, openly, will REDUCE the attacks on the troops, UNLESS, the fighters are in fact, US endorsed or funded militias.
It is clear that Padilla needed to commit no crimes, in order to be held without due process or without reasons. How anyone justifies this, based on a position of denial about the malevolence of the Government, or worse, based on an awareness of it and approving it, is what I cannot fathom.
The anti missile or defense spending is what HOLDS THIS NATION'S ECONOMY together. THE US MUST CREATE ENEMIES, to give the nuclear industry reason to exist, promote nuclear fuel to Iran, N Korea then turn around and point fingers, and is all part of the game of keeping the money in the pockets of the few global elite. If the Americans cannot tolerate this, then I suggest it is time to make commitments to changing it.
I would start with the elimination of the entire congress. The New congress cannot hold stocks, board positions and the corporate Lobby process must be eliminated, along with the Federal Reserve Bank.
It is time the American people grew up and showed some evidence of ability to self govern.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Watch subject. Bush and the Republicans were not protecting us on 9-11, and we aren't a lot safer now. We may be more afraid due to george bush, but are we safer? Being fearful does not necessarily make one safer. Fear can cause people to hide and cower. What do you think? How does that work in a democracy again? How does being more threatening make us more likeable?Isn't
the country with the most weapons the biggest threat to the rest of the world? When one country is the biggest threat to the rest of the world, isn't that likely to be the most hated country?
Our country is in debt until forever, we don't have jobs, and we live in fear. We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths.
The more people that the government puts in jails, the safer we are told to think we are. The real terrorists are wherever they are, but they aren't living in a country with bars on the windows. We are.